[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13120400#comment-13120400
]
Jonathan Gray commented on HBASE-4534:
--------------------------------------
Are we thinking these read optimizations are going to only go into 0.94?
(Seems reasonable to me, but I will be pulling them into our internal 92 branch)
> A new unit test for lazy seek and StoreScanner in general
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4534
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Test
> Affects Versions: 0.94.0
> Reporter: Mikhail Bautin
> Assignee: Mikhail Bautin
>
> A randomized unit test for Gets/Scans (all-row, single-row, multi-row,
> all-column, single-column, and multi-column). Also all combinations of Bloom
> filters and compression (NONE vs GZIP) are tested. The unit test flushes
> multiple StoreFiles with disjoint timestamp ranges and runs various types of
> queries against them. Currently we are not testing overlapping timestamp
> ranges.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
