[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14626782#comment-14626782
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-12296:
------------------------------------------------
I understood the intent for moving to CellComparator but this comparator is
some special thing? Anyway no problem. Anyway is fine with me.
bq.So what you say is add this new abstract class and deprecated
ByteArrayComparable in favor of the new one ? Am ok with both ways.
Your call. If we add an abstract class and deprecate this then in 3.0 we can
remove the ByteArrayComparable totally right?
> Filters should work with ByteBufferedCell
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12296
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: regionserver, Scanners
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: Anoop Sam John
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-12296_v1.patch
>
>
> Now we have added an extension for Cell in server side, ByteBufferedCell,
> where Cells are backed by BB (on heap or off heap). When the Cell is backed
> by off heap buffer, the getXXXArray() APIs has to create temp byte[] and do
> data copy and return that. This will be bit costly. We have avoided this in
> areas like CellComparator/SQM etc. Filter area was not touched in that patch.
> This Jira aims at doing it in Filter area.
> Eg : SCVF checking the cell value for the given value condition. It uses
> getValueArray() to get cell value bytes. When the cell is BB backed, it has
> to use getValueByteBuffer() API instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
