[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14634153#comment-14634153
]
Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-12751:
---------------------------------------
An edit that's skipping the wal will still queue an empty edit to the wal, just
not wait on it to append or sync. ( that's the same as what's there now just in
a different order )
> Allow RowLock to be reader writer
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: regionserver
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Assignee: Elliott Clark
> Attachments: HBASE-12751-v1.patch, HBASE-12751-v10.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v10.patch, HBASE-12751-v11.patch, HBASE-12751-v12.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v13.patch, HBASE-12751-v2.patch, HBASE-12751-v3.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v4.patch, HBASE-12751-v5.patch, HBASE-12751-v6.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v7.patch, HBASE-12751-v8.patch, HBASE-12751-v9.patch,
> HBASE-12751.patch
>
>
> Right now every write operation grabs a row lock. This is to prevent values
> from changing during a read modify write operation (increment or check and
> put). However it limits parallelism in several different scenarios.
> If there are several puts to the same row but different columns or stores
> then this is very limiting.
> If there are puts to the same column then mvcc number should ensure a
> consistent ordering. So locking is not needed.
> However locking for check and put or increment is still needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
