[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14637309#comment-14637309
]
Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-12751:
---------------------------------------
So here's a new patch with a cleaner row locking. It uses the java provided
re-entrant lock for reader writer.
It passes the few unit tests that I've been using for spot checking. Lets see
how this looks on hadoop qa.
> Allow RowLock to be reader writer
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-12751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12751
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: regionserver
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Assignee: Elliott Clark
> Attachments: HBASE-12751-v1.patch, HBASE-12751-v10.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v10.patch, HBASE-12751-v11.patch, HBASE-12751-v12.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v13.patch, HBASE-12751-v14.patch, HBASE-12751-v2.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v3.patch, HBASE-12751-v4.patch, HBASE-12751-v5.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v6.patch, HBASE-12751-v7.patch, HBASE-12751-v8.patch,
> HBASE-12751-v9.patch, HBASE-12751.patch
>
>
> Right now every write operation grabs a row lock. This is to prevent values
> from changing during a read modify write operation (increment or check and
> put). However it limits parallelism in several different scenarios.
> If there are several puts to the same row but different columns or stores
> then this is very limiting.
> If there are puts to the same column then mvcc number should ensure a
> consistent ordering. So locking is not needed.
> However locking for check and put or increment is still needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
