[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14717244#comment-14717244
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-14318:
---------------------------------------

bq. You guys using this script too?
Yep, I still use the script. 

You are forcing a local mvn repo which is brand new just for the artifacts. 
Seems good. However next {{mvn deploy}} should also use this repo, so update 
the docs in the release section? Or we can suggest adding  a 
{{maven.repo.local}} to your {{~/.m2/settings.xml}} in the doc. 

Will this work with only from hbase root dir ? 
{code}
-archivedir="${HBASE_HOME}/../`basename $0`.$d"
+archivedir="$(pwd)/../`basename $0`.$d"
{code}

> make_rc.sh should purge/re-resolve dependencies from local repository
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14318
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14318
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
>            Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0, 1.0.3, 1.1.3
>
>         Attachments: 14318.branch-1.1.patch, 14318.branch-1.1.v1.patch, 
> 14318.branch-1.1.v2.patch
>
>
> Over on the 1.1.2RC1 VOTE thread, impressively pedantic [~enis] noticed the 
> underlying hadoop version was built locally, not from upstream. Until such 
> time as we can reliably build releases in a clean-room environment, let's 
> have our scripts clean up after us.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to