[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14906258#comment-14906258
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-14456:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12762093/HBASE-14456.branch-1.patch
  against branch-1 branch at commit 5b7894f92ba3e9ff700da1e9194ebb4774d8b71e.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12762093

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 87 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all 
supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.7.0 2.7.1)

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 protoc{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of protoc compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

                {color:red}-1 checkstyle{color}.  The applied patch generated 
3799 checkstyle errors (more than the master's current 3798 errors).

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any  new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
     

     {color:red}-1 core zombie tests{color}.  There are 3 zombie test(s): 

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15713//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3)        warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15713//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15713//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html

                Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/15713//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Implement a namespace-based region grouping strategy for 
> RegionGroupingProvider
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-14456
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14456
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-14456.branch-1.patch, HBASE-14456.patch, 
> HBASE-14456_v2.patch, HBASE-14456_v3.patch
>
>
> In HBASE-5699 we introduced multiple wal, and after some succeeding works we 
> now have two main kinds of wal providers: DefaultWALProvider and 
> RegionGroupingProvider, while DefaultWALProvider supplies a _single_ wal per 
> regionserver, RegionGroupingProvider supplies _multiple_ wals according to 
> the RegionGroupingStrategy it's using.
> Now there're two kinds of RegionGroupingStrategy: _identity_ and _bounded_, 
> in which "identity" only for testing (trial) purpose and "bounded" for 
> randomly assigning region writes to bounded number of wals. Although the 
> "bounded" strategy is good enough for IO leverage, we may still want a more 
> "designed" way to distribute the region writes, like having one wal group per 
> business.
> Since we already have namespace for multi-tenancy, it would be good to have 
> namespace-based grouping strategy, and this is exactly what this JIRA is for.
> There might be more benefits if we have namespace-based wal group, like only 
> replicating data for the namespace in need w/o filtering anything useless, or 
> only force region flush for the heavy loaded namespace, etc. although we  
> won't include all these in this single JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to