[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14909262#comment-14909262
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-14456:
-------------------------------
Thanks for the review [~tedyu] :-)
> Implement a namespace-based region grouping strategy for
> RegionGroupingProvider
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14456
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14456
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
> Reporter: Yu Li
> Assignee: Yu Li
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-14456.branch-1.patch,
> HBASE-14456.branch-1.v2.patch, HBASE-14456.patch, HBASE-14456_v2.patch,
> HBASE-14456_v3.patch
>
>
> In HBASE-5699 we introduced multiple wal, and after some succeeding works we
> now have two main kinds of wal providers: DefaultWALProvider and
> RegionGroupingProvider, while DefaultWALProvider supplies a _single_ wal per
> regionserver, RegionGroupingProvider supplies _multiple_ wals according to
> the RegionGroupingStrategy it's using.
> Now there're two kinds of RegionGroupingStrategy: _identity_ and _bounded_,
> in which "identity" only for testing (trial) purpose and "bounded" for
> randomly assigning region writes to bounded number of wals. Although the
> "bounded" strategy is good enough for IO leverage, we may still want a more
> "designed" way to distribute the region writes, like having one wal group per
> business.
> Since we already have namespace for multi-tenancy, it would be good to have
> namespace-based grouping strategy, and this is exactly what this JIRA is for.
> There might be more benefits if we have namespace-based wal group, like only
> replicating data for the namespace in need w/o filtering anything useless, or
> only force region flush for the heavy loaded namespace, etc. although we
> won't include all these in this single JIRA.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
