[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15069512#comment-15069512
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-15027:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12779209/HBASE-15027_2.patch
against master branch at commit 1af98f255132ef6716a1f6ba1d8d71a36ea38840.
ATTACHMENT ID: 12779209
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop versions{color}. The patch compiles with all
supported hadoop versions (2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.0 2.6.1 2.7.0
2.7.1)
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 protoc{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of protoc compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 checkstyle{color}. The applied patch does not generate new
checkstyle errors.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn post-site goal succeeds with this
patch.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestRegionReplicas
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionReplayEvents
{color:green}+1 zombies{color}. No zombie tests found running at the end of
the build.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16990//testReport/
Release Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16990//artifact/patchprocess/newFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle Errors:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16990//artifact/patchprocess/checkstyle-aggregate.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/16990//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Refactor the way the CompactedHFileDischarger threads are created
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15027
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15027
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15027.patch, HBASE-15027_1.patch,
> HBASE-15027_2.patch
>
>
> As per suggestion given over in HBASE-14970, if we need to create a single
> thread pool service for the CompactionHFileDischarger we need to create an
> exectuor service in the RegionServer level and create discharger handler
> threads (Event handlers) and pass the Event to the new Exectuor service that
> we create for the compaction hfiles discharger. What should be the default
> number of threads here? If a HRS holds 100 of regions - will 10 threads be
> enough? This issue will try to resolve this with tests and discussions and
> suitable patch will be updated in HBASE-14970 for branch-1 once this is
> committed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)