[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15094305#comment-15094305
]
Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-14457:
---------------------------------------
Thanks for publishing your tests. These are awesome. We are also running
multi-wal in production; we saw good results at the time.
What are the units for throughput on the last table?
Was the network ever saturated in the test ? ( The reason I ask is that the
average latency seems pretty high)
Were flushes ever the bottleneck ? ie did mutates ever block for being over the
high water mark?
> Umbrella: Improve Multiple WAL for production usage
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14457
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Reporter: Yu Li
> Assignee: Yu Li
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>
> Attachments: Action in Multiple WAL.pdf
>
>
> HBASE-5699 proposed the idea to run with multiple WAL in regionserver and did
> a great initial work there, but when trying to use it in our production
> cluster, we still found several issues to resolve, like tracking multiple WAL
> paths in replication (HBASE-6617), fixing UT with multiwal provider
> (HBASE-14411), introducing a namespace-based strategy for
> RegionGroupingProvider (HBASE-14456), etc. This is an umbrella including(but
> not limited of) all these works and efforts to make multiple wal ready for
> production usage and give user a clear picture about it.
> Besides the developing works done, I'd also like to share some scenarios and
> testing/online data in this JIRA about our usage/performance of multiple wal,
> to(hopefully) help people better judge whether to enable multiple wal or not
> in their own cluster and what they might gain.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
