[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15095606#comment-15095606
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-14457:
-------------------------------
Oh yes, forgot to mention that in doc. The YCSB version is 0.3.1, and the hbase
version in last test (PCIe SSD) is our 0.98.12 with multiple wal function
backported. Use 0.98.12 since we need a comparison with our online data, JFYI.
> Umbrella: Improve Multiple WAL for production usage
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14457
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Reporter: Yu Li
> Assignee: Yu Li
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0
>
> Attachments: Action in Multiple WAL.pdf, Action in Multiple WAL.pdf
>
>
> HBASE-5699 proposed the idea to run with multiple WAL in regionserver and did
> a great initial work there, but when trying to use it in our production
> cluster, we still found several issues to resolve, like tracking multiple WAL
> paths in replication (HBASE-6617), fixing UT with multiwal provider
> (HBASE-14411), introducing a namespace-based strategy for
> RegionGroupingProvider (HBASE-14456), etc. This is an umbrella including(but
> not limited of) all these works and efforts to make multiple wal ready for
> production usage and give user a clear picture about it.
> Besides the developing works done, I'd also like to share some scenarios and
> testing/online data in this JIRA about our usage/performance of multiple wal,
> to(hopefully) help people better judge whether to enable multiple wal or not
> in their own cluster and what they might gain.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
