[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15176837#comment-15176837
]
Francis Liu commented on HBASE-6721:
------------------------------------
Attached patch which is pretty much done except for the negative port concern.
{quote}
Yeah, address the groups naming thing.
{quote}
Done. Change classes, packages, etc to RSGroups.
{quote}
Address the ServerName questions, breaking compat is not an option.
{quote}
It seems clear now the serverName form I fixed in TestMasterStatusServlet is
indeed a typo. So the current patch can still support the old form. Tho it
cannot support negative port numbers due to port restrictions. Let me know if
this is not acceptable.
{quote}
Don't go around the Metrics to get to jmx
{quote}
Removed JMX this code from the base patch and filed HBASE-15382
{quote}
Don't create a new protobuf class when not needed
{quote}
Done
{quote}
Move it into a different module with a profile that doesn't include it.
{quote}
Done. Tho RSGroup protos are still in hbase-protocol and there's one POJO
(RSGroupInfo) that had to stay in hbase-common as it is needed by the RSGroup
related MasterObserver CP methods. RSGroup shell is also still in hbase-shell.
> RegionServer Group based Assignment
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6721
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6721
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Francis Liu
> Assignee: Francis Liu
> Labels: hbase-6721
> Attachments: 6721-master-webUI.patch, HBASE-6721
> GroupBasedLoadBalancer Sequence Diagram.xml, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf,
> HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf, HBASE-6721-DesigDoc.pdf,
> HBASE-6721_0.98_2.patch, HBASE-6721_10.patch, HBASE-6721_11.patch,
> HBASE-6721_12.patch, HBASE-6721_13.patch, HBASE-6721_14.patch,
> HBASE-6721_15.patch, HBASE-6721_8.patch, HBASE-6721_9.patch,
> HBASE-6721_9.patch, HBASE-6721_94.patch, HBASE-6721_94.patch,
> HBASE-6721_94_2.patch, HBASE-6721_94_3.patch, HBASE-6721_94_3.patch,
> HBASE-6721_94_4.patch, HBASE-6721_94_5.patch, HBASE-6721_94_6.patch,
> HBASE-6721_94_7.patch, HBASE-6721_98_1.patch, HBASE-6721_98_2.patch,
> HBASE-6721_hbase-6721_addendum.patch, HBASE-6721_trunk.patch,
> HBASE-6721_trunk.patch, HBASE-6721_trunk.patch, HBASE-6721_trunk1.patch,
> HBASE-6721_trunk2.patch, balanceCluster Sequence Diagram.svg,
> hbase-6721-v15-branch-1.1.patch, hbase-6721-v16.patch, hbase-6721-v17.patch,
> hbase-6721-v18.patch, hbase-6721-v19.patch, hbase-6721-v20.patch,
> hbase-6721-v21.patch, hbase-6721-v22.patch, hbase-6721-v23.patch,
> hbase-6721-v25.patch, hbase-6721-v26.patch, hbase-6721-v26_draft1.patch,
> immediateAssignments Sequence Diagram.svg, randomAssignment Sequence
> Diagram.svg, retainAssignment Sequence Diagram.svg, roundRobinAssignment
> Sequence Diagram.svg
>
>
> In multi-tenant deployments of HBase, it is likely that a RegionServer will
> be serving out regions from a number of different tables owned by various
> client applications. Being able to group a subset of running RegionServers
> and assign specific tables to it, provides a client application a level of
> isolation and resource allocation.
> The proposal essentially is to have an AssignmentManager which is aware of
> RegionServer groups and assigns tables to region servers based on groupings.
> Load balancing will occur on a per group basis as well.
> This is essentially a simplification of the approach taken in HBASE-4120. See
> attached document.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
