[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15178000#comment-15178000
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-15325:
------------------------------------------------

Consolidating the discussion over in RB, the code and the comments here, I 
think internally marking partial or not is upto us but correcting the javadoc 
makes sense. Also IMHO, coming to the patch, saying that BATCH_LIMIT_REACHED as 
partial is fine with me because setBatch() even if done by user it indirectly 
means he is expecting partial results. So even if the 2nd RPC completes 
retrieving the entire row setting it partial still makes sense. 

> ResultScanner allowing partial result will miss the rest of the row if the 
> region is moved between two rpc requests
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15325
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15325
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dataloss, Scanners
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.1.3
>            Reporter: Phil Yang
>            Assignee: Phil Yang
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: 15325-test.txt, HBASE-15325-v1.txt, HBASE-15325-v2.txt, 
> HBASE-15325-v3.txt, HBASE-15325-v5.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.1.txt, 
> HBASE-15325-v6.2.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.3.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.4.txt, 
> HBASE-15325-v6.5.txt, HBASE-15325-v6.txt
>
>
> HBASE-11544 allow scan rpc return partial of a row to reduce memory usage for 
> one rpc request. And client can setAllowPartial or setBatch to get several 
> cells in a row instead of the whole row.
> However, the status of the scanner is saved on server and we need this to get 
> the next part if there is a partial result before. If we move the region to 
> another RS, client will get a NotServingRegionException and open a new 
> scanner to the new RS which will be regarded as a new scan from the end of 
> this row. So the rest cells of the row of last result will be missing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to