[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15200175#comment-15200175
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-11393:
---------------------------------------

bq. Do we need to go on this issue? Enis Soztutar
Yes. Thanks for the reminder. Let me do another pass today. 

> Replication TableCfs should be a PB object rather than a string
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Heng Chen
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-11393.patch, HBASE-11393_v1.patch, 
> HBASE-11393_v10.patch, HBASE-11393_v11.patch, HBASE-11393_v12.patch, 
> HBASE-11393_v2.patch, HBASE-11393_v3.patch, HBASE-11393_v4.patch, 
> HBASE-11393_v5.patch, HBASE-11393_v6.patch, HBASE-11393_v7.patch, 
> HBASE-11393_v8.patch, HBASE-11393_v9.patch
>
>
> We concatenate the list of tables and column families in format  
> "table1:cf1,cf2;table2:cfA,cfB" in zookeeper for table-cf to replication peer 
> mapping. 
> This results in ugly parsing code. We should do this a PB object. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to