[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218837#comment-15218837
]
Geoffrey Jacoby commented on HBASE-11393:
-----------------------------------------
Thanks for this [~chenheng]; the tracker on the replication peer config is
already proving useful.
Has the decision been made to remove "add_peer peer_id, cluster_key" from the
Ruby shell in addition to the equivalent methods on ReplicationAdmin, as this
JIRA does? While the ReplicationAdmin methods are marked as Deprecated in 1.0,
and thus seem fair game to remove in 2.0, the Ruby method that takes a string
rather than a dictionary is still the "official" way to create a peer in the
HBase shell in the HBase book on hbase.apache.org. If nothing else the doc
should probably be updated.
Its removal as part of this JIRA is also breaking TestReplicationShell
(currently set as Ignore because it was apparently flaky in the past), but
which I've been using locally to verify some shell changes I'm working on for
HBASE-15507. I can fix the test, but want to confirm that it's the test that
needs to change.
> Replication TableCfs should be a PB object rather than a string
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11393
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11393
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Heng Chen
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-11393.patch, HBASE-11393_v1.patch,
> HBASE-11393_v10.patch, HBASE-11393_v11.patch, HBASE-11393_v12.patch,
> HBASE-11393_v14.patch, HBASE-11393_v15.patch, HBASE-11393_v16.patch,
> HBASE-11393_v2.patch, HBASE-11393_v3.patch, HBASE-11393_v4.patch,
> HBASE-11393_v5.patch, HBASE-11393_v6.patch, HBASE-11393_v7.patch,
> HBASE-11393_v8.patch, HBASE-11393_v9.patch
>
>
> We concatenate the list of tables and column families in format
> "table1:cf1,cf2;table2:cfA,cfB" in zookeeper for table-cf to replication peer
> mapping.
> This results in ugly parsing code. We should do this a PB object.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
