[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15205671#comment-15205671 ]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-15411: --------------------------------------- To create an RB for reviewing this, I have committed the patch for HBASE-14030 (v42) to the apache branch HBASE-7912. We can use this branch at Apache as a working branch for now (meaning that we can use this for rebases and committing patches before full-review cycle. Review board is here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45146/diff/1#index_header. I'm not sure whether I can change ownership of the RB for future patch iterations, if not, you can re-create another RB. It seems that if you do {code} git diff --full-index {code} RB will automatically pick up the correct base for the patch. > Rewrite backup with Procedure V2 > -------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-15411 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15411 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ted Yu > Assignee: Ted Yu > Attachments: 15411-v1.txt, 15411-v11.txt, 15411-v12.txt, > 15411-v13.txt, 15411-v14.txt, 15411-v15.txt, 15411-v16.txt, 15411-v18.txt, > 15411-v3.txt, 15411-v5.txt, 15411-v6.txt, 15411-v7.txt, 15411-v9.txt, > FullTableBackupProcedure.java > > > Currently full / incremental backup is driven by BackupHandler (see call() > method for flow). > This issue is to rewrite the flow using Procedure V2. > States (enum) for full / incremental backup would be introduced in > Backup.proto which correspond to the steps performed in BackupHandler#call(). > executeFromState() would pace the backup based on the current state. > serializeStateData() / deserializeStateData() would be used to persist state > into procedure WAL. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)