[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15209785#comment-15209785
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-15525:
----------------------------------------

For writing the CellBlock response, we really dont need the whole of it in one 
BB.   While writing the response to socket, we have a BufferChain. The Cell 
block can also be backed by N BBs rather than 1.   Even within BufferChain, can 
see that the actual write to socket happens as chunks of 64 KB size.  So if we 
have a cell block of 512 KB and instead of one BB, we have 4 BBs of size 128 KB 
each,  the socket write wont take more time as the total #writes in both case 
will be same.

With a model of writing cell block to N smaller sized BBs, we can avoid the 
need for regrow (In BBOutputStream) and copy from old smaller sized BB to new 
BB.  We need a new BBOS which can do this way of write.   This one will passed 
to Encoder for writing the Cells to form cell block.

> OutOfMemory could occur when using BoundedByteBufferPool during RPC bursts
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15525
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15525
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: IPC/RPC
>            Reporter: deepankar
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>            Priority: Critical
>
> After HBASE-13819 the system some times run out of direct memory whenever 
> there is some network congestion or some client side issues.
> This was because of pending RPCs in the RPCServer$Connection.responseQueue 
> and since all the responses in this queue hold a buffer for cellblock from 
> BoundedByteBufferPool this could takeup a lot of memory if the 
> BoundedByteBufferPool's moving average settles down towards a higher value 
> See the discussion here 
> [HBASE-13819-comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13819?focusedCommentId=15207822&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15207822]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to