[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15245481#comment-15245481
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15650:
-----------------------------------

[~stack]

{{TestVisibilityLabelsWithDeletes.testDeleteColumnWithLatestTimeStampWhenNoVersionMatches}}
 fails with this exception

{noformat}
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 
Timestamp cannot be negative. minStamp:-9223372036854775808, maxStamp:128
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.flush.RegionServerFlushTableProcedureManager$FlushTableSubprocedurePool.waitForOutstandingTasks(RegionServerFlushTableProcedureManager.java:251)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.flush.FlushTableSubprocedure.flushRegions(FlushTableSubprocedure.java:102)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.flush.FlushTableSubprocedure.acquireBarrier(FlushTableSubprocedure.java:113)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.Subprocedure.call(Subprocedure.java:166)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.Subprocedure.call(Subprocedure.java:1)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Timestamp cannot be negative. 
minStamp:-9223372036854775808, maxStamp:128
        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.TimeRange.<init>(TimeRange.java:81)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TimeRangeTracker.toTimeRange(TimeRangeTracker.java:204)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.ImmutableSegment.<init>(ImmutableSegment.java:44)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.SegmentFactory.createImmutableSegment(SegmentFactory.java:57)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.DefaultMemStore.snapshot(DefaultMemStore.java:93)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore$StoreFlusherImpl.prepare(HStore.java:2151)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.internalPrepareFlushCache(HRegion.java:2324)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.internalFlushcache(HRegion.java:2192)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.internalFlushcache(HRegion.java:2163)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.flushcache(HRegion.java:2054)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.flush(HRegion.java:1980)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.flush.FlushTableSubprocedure$RegionFlushTask.call(FlushTableSubprocedure.java:68)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.flush.FlushTableSubprocedure$RegionFlushTask.call(FlushTableSubprocedure.java:1)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
        at 
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
        ... 4 more
{noformat}

Seems caused by this patch?

Thanks.

> Remove TimeRangeTracker as point of contention when many threads reading a 
> StoreFile
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15650
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15650
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Performance
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.3.0, 1.4.0
>
>         Attachments: 15650.branch-1.patch, 15650.branch-1.patch, 15650.patch, 
> 15650.patch, 15650v2.branch-1.patch, 15650v2.patch, 15650v3.patch, 
> 15650v4.patch, 15650v5.patch, 15650v6.patch, 
> Point-of-contention-on-random-read.png
>
>
> HBASE-12148 is about "Remove TimeRangeTracker as point of contention when 
> many threads writing a Store". It is also a point of contention when reading.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to