[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15408194#comment-15408194
]
stack commented on HBASE-16308:
-------------------------------
This is interesting failure:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.commons.httpclient.URIException
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
... 26 more
Looking for changes to httpserver .....
> Contain protobuf references
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16308
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16308
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Protobufs
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Attachments: HBASE-16308.master.001.patch,
> HBASE-16308.master.002.patch, HBASE-16308.master.003.patch,
> HBASE-16308.master.004.patch, HBASE-16308.master.005.patch,
> HBASE-16308.master.006.patch
>
>
> Clean up our protobuf references so contained to just a few classes rather
> than being spread about the codebase. Doing this work will make it easier
> landing the parent issue and will make it more clear where the division
> between shaded protobuf and unshaded protobuf lies (we need to continue with
> unshaded protobuf for HDFS references by AsyncWAL and probably EndPoint
> Coprocessors)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
