[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159153#comment-13159153
 ] 

jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HBASE-4605:
------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#review3551
-----------------------------------------------------------


Most of what I see is just style issues, and a number of the HTableDescriptor 
changes seem unnecessary.  If we clean up those, and assuming the latest patch 
has some documentation, I think this is looking pretty good.


src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HTableDescriptor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7921>

    Nice addition to have



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HTableDescriptor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7913>

    I don't see why these changes are necessary when I don't see them being 
used anywhere outside of HTD?  Do these additions buy us anything?  In my 
opinion, they're not making the code any clearer than the current 
Byte.toString(), etc.



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7916>

    style nit: if body should be contained in braces



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7914>

    Add constraints.size() to this message and you don't need the separate 
LOG.debug() message.



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7912>

    style nit: for loop body should be enclosed in braces



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7917>

    I see the usage outside of HTD now, but still don't see where this provides 
more utility than Bytes.toString()



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7918>

    Be consistent with braces here



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7915>

    if / else bodies should be contained in braces.



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/IntegerConstraint.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7922>

    This still seems odd to me.  I can't see storing an integer value encoded 
as a string, in order to be able to check for it being a valid integer.
    
    I would think most users would be storing integer values using 
Bytes.toInt(), for which the checks here would not work.



src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/package-info.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7919>

    This differs from what seems to be the latest patch in JIRA 
(java_HBASE-4605_v3.txt).  Are there other differences than the javadoc?
    
    For a patch of this size, review still belongs here in review board (even 
with HadoopQA patch testing), so we should keep both versions in sync.  Please 
update the diff here with the latest patch.



src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/TestConstraints.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#comment7920>

    brace alignment and indentation


- Gary


On 2011-11-23 21:19:56, Jesse Yates wrote:
bq.  
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  
bq.  (Updated 2011-11-23 21:19:56)
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Review request for hbase.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Summary
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  Most of the implementation for adding constraints as a coprocessor. 
bq.  
bq.  Looking for general comments on style/structure, though nitpicks are ok 
too. 
bq.  
bq.  Currently missing implementation for disableConstraints() since that will 
require adding removeCoprocessor() to HTD (also comments on if this is worth it 
would be good). 
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  This addresses bug HBASE-4605.
bq.      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4605
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Diffs
bq.  -----
bq.  
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HTableDescriptor.java 84a0d1a 
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/BaseConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintException.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/IntegerConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/package-info.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TestHTableDescriptor.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/AllFailConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/AllPassConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/CheckConfigurationConstraint.java
 PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/IntegrationTestConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/RuntimeFailConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/TestConstraints.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/TestIntegerConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/WorksConstraint.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.  
bq.  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Testing
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  Adding IntegrationTestConstraint and unit tests for Constraints and 
IntegerConstraint. All of those pass.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Thanks,
bq.  
bq.  Jesse
bq.  
bq.


                
> Constraints
> -----------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4605
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4605
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client, coprocessors
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>            Reporter: Jesse Yates
>            Assignee: Jesse Yates
>         Attachments: 4605.v7, constraint_as_cp.txt, java_Constraint_v2.patch, 
> java_HBASE-4605_v1.patch, java_HBASE-4605_v2.patch, java_HBASE-4605_v3.patch
>
>
> From Jesse's comment on dev:
> {quote}
> What I would like to propose is a simple interface that people can use to 
> implement a 'constraint' (matching the classic database definition). This 
> would help ease of adoption by helping HBase more easily check that box, help 
> minimize code duplication across organizations, and lead to easier adoption.
> Essentially, people would implement a 'Constraint' interface for checking 
> keys before they are put into a table. Puts that are valid get written to the 
> table, but if not people can will throw an exception that gets propagated 
> back to the client explaining why the put was invalid.
> Constraints would be set on a per-table basis and the user would be expected 
> to ensure the jars containing the constraint are present on the machines 
> serving that table.
> Yes, people could roll their own mechanism for doing this via coprocessors 
> each time, but this would make it easier to do so, so you only have to 
> implement a very minimal interface and not worry about the specifics.
> {quote}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to