[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159508#comment-13159508 ]
jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HBASE-4605: ------------------------------------------------------ bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > Most of what I see is just style issues, and a number of the HTableDescriptor changes seem unnecessary. If we clean up those, and assuming the latest patch has some documentation, I think this is looking pretty good. Uploading the latest (with some of your recommended changes) after this. Couple of concerns may still need to be worked out around IntegerConstraint and the mods to HTD. Let me know what you think. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/package-info.java, line 22 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59947#file59947line22> bq. > bq. > This differs from what seems to be the latest patch in JIRA (java_HBASE-4605_v3.txt). Are there other differences than the javadoc? bq. > bq. > For a patch of this size, review still belongs here in review board (even with HadoopQA patch testing), so we should keep both versions in sync. Please update the diff here with the latest patch. Yeah, this is the old version. Whats up on the ticket is just documentation. I'll put up the latest here after making the changes. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java, line 250 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59945#file59945line250> bq. > bq. > if / else bodies should be contained in braces. done. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java, line 233 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59945#file59945line233> bq. > bq. > Be consistent with braces here Just following the requirements of java :) Done. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java, line 22 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59945#file59945line22> bq. > bq. > I see the usage outside of HTD now, but still don't see where this provides more utility than Bytes.toString() By pulling the functionality out of the HTD we can be sure that outside classes don't have to worry about making sure they use the 'right' (de)serialization of they keys. Right now we don't want to to anything more than just Bytes.toString(), but in the future we could make it something more complex. For example, take the case where user specified keys are prepended with a special identifier, so we can tell the difference between the two. Alternatively, we could do some cool stuff to cut down on object creation (potentially) with the key conversion or make it faster or more compact or w/e. Basically, I'm just adding the encapsulation so classes outside of the HTD don't have to know about the fact that the HTD is using Bytes.toString() (and encapsulation is good, right?). This way it is obvious, to an outside class, what is going - oh, it just serializing the key. This makes the addCP code much cleaner too. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java, line 86 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59944#file59944line86> bq. > bq. > style nit: for loop body should be enclosed in braces Done bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java, line 76 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59944#file59944line76> bq. > bq. > Add constraints.size() to this message and you don't need the separate LOG.debug() message. Done bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java, line 61 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59944#file59944line61> bq. > bq. > style nit: if body should be contained in braces Done. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/IntegerConstraint.java, line 32 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59946#file59946line32> bq. > bq. > This still seems odd to me. I can't see storing an integer value encoded as a string, in order to be able to check for it being a valid integer. bq. > bq. > I would think most users would be storing integer values using Bytes.toInt(), for which the checks here would not work. The only problem with using the Bytes deserialization checking is that even if you put a string in as bytes, it can be read out as an integer (in certain cases). Therefore, you could get a case where something that should not be an integer is allowed when it really ought not to be. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/TestConstraints.java, line 90 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59954#file59954line90> bq. > bq. > brace alignment and indentation Done. bq. On 2011-11-29 08:36:29, Gary Helmling wrote: bq. > src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HTableDescriptor.java, line 1166 bq. > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff/6/?file=59940#file59940line1166> bq. > bq. > I don't see why these changes are necessary when I don't see them being used anywhere outside of HTD? Do these additions buy us anything? In my opinion, they're not making the code any clearer than the current Byte.toString(), etc. See response below. - Jesse ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/#review3551 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-11-23 21:19:56, Jesse Yates wrote: bq. bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: bq. https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/ bq. ----------------------------------------------------------- bq. bq. (Updated 2011-11-23 21:19:56) bq. bq. bq. Review request for hbase. bq. bq. bq. Summary bq. ------- bq. bq. Most of the implementation for adding constraints as a coprocessor. bq. bq. Looking for general comments on style/structure, though nitpicks are ok too. bq. bq. Currently missing implementation for disableConstraints() since that will require adding removeCoprocessor() to HTD (also comments on if this is worth it would be good). bq. bq. bq. This addresses bug HBASE-4605. bq. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4605 bq. bq. bq. Diffs bq. ----- bq. bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HTableDescriptor.java 84a0d1a bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/BaseConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintException.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/ConstraintProcessor.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/Constraints.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/IntegerConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/package-info.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TestHTableDescriptor.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/AllFailConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/AllPassConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/CheckConfigurationConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/IntegrationTestConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/RuntimeFailConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/TestConstraints.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/TestIntegerConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/constraint/WorksConstraint.java PRE-CREATION bq. bq. Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2579/diff bq. bq. bq. Testing bq. ------- bq. bq. Adding IntegrationTestConstraint and unit tests for Constraints and IntegerConstraint. All of those pass. bq. bq. bq. Thanks, bq. bq. Jesse bq. bq. > Constraints > ----------- > > Key: HBASE-4605 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4605 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: client, coprocessors > Affects Versions: 0.94.0 > Reporter: Jesse Yates > Assignee: Jesse Yates > Attachments: 4605.v7, constraint_as_cp.txt, java_Constraint_v2.patch, > java_HBASE-4605_v1.patch, java_HBASE-4605_v2.patch, java_HBASE-4605_v3.patch > > > From Jesse's comment on dev: > {quote} > What I would like to propose is a simple interface that people can use to > implement a 'constraint' (matching the classic database definition). This > would help ease of adoption by helping HBase more easily check that box, help > minimize code duplication across organizations, and lead to easier adoption. > Essentially, people would implement a 'Constraint' interface for checking > keys before they are put into a table. Puts that are valid get written to the > table, but if not people can will throw an exception that gets propagated > back to the client explaining why the put was invalid. > Constraints would be set on a per-table basis and the user would be expected > to ensure the jars containing the constraint are present on the machines > serving that table. > Yes, people could roll their own mechanism for doing this via coprocessors > each time, but this would make it easier to do so, so you only have to > implement a very minimal interface and not worry about the specifics. > {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira