[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15425638#comment-15425638
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16433:
-----------------------------------
I agree that the protobuf stub is not a good abstraction of event-driven code,
but I do not think it is a good idea to partially bypass it. The string name
mapping in the protobuf code is generated by protoc, so it is much safer than
our hand-written mapping code. None or all, my suggestion. We should either
implement our code on the suck but work stub, or change to use something new
such as grpc as our RPC layer.
Thanks.
> Remove AsyncRpcChannel related stuffs
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16433
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16433.patch
>
>
> AsyncRpcChannel can not be used by protobuf stub. We should implement the
> async logic along with the RpcChannel interface of protobuf.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
