[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Heng Chen updated HBASE-16652:
------------------------------
Attachment: 1.diff
add time log for each step in append/increment path, and do tests with PE 3
times.
|| type || client_time || reckonDeltas || doWALAppend || sync ||
|| a_1 || 2.06ms || 0.06ms || 1.7ms || 1.6ms ||
|| a_2 || 1.81ms || 0.05ms || 1.4ms || 1.3ms ||
|| a_3 || 1.87ms || 0.05ms || 1.5ms || 1.4ms ||
|| i_1 || 2.47ms || 0.05ms || 2.1ms || 2.0ms ||
|| i_2 || 2.39ms || 0.06ms || 2.0ms || 1.9ms ||
|| i_3 || 2.36ms || 0.06ms || 2.0ms || 1.9ms ||
It seems the main difference is sync wal??
> Figure out performance difference between increment and append
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16652
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Heng Chen
> Labels: performance
> Attachments: 1.diff, HBASE-16652.patch, append.jfr,
> append_get_profile.png, increment.jfr, increment_get_profile.png
>
>
> When do performance test in HBASE-16625, i found it has the very big
> difference between Append and Increment (append is about 37% faster than
> increment).
> As [~stack] mentioned in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16610?focusedCommentId=15493166&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15493166,
> append and increment has been unified in server-side, and they looks the
> same in client-side.
> This issue is to figure out why the performance looks different between them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
