[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15515258#comment-15515258
 ] 

Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15921:
-----------------------------------

Let's talk about the retry and timeout logic.

In general, I think we should only do retry at one place, which means, we 
always restart from the beginning. We can config different timeout values for 
different stages, but the actual timeout when executing the operation will also 
be limited by the whole operation timeout config. This could simplify our 
logic. For example, we do not need to implement retry logic in rpc(Yeah I have 
just removed the reconnect logic in NettyRpcConnection). And it is also much 
easier for us to implement the backoff logic.

What do you think? [~stack] [~carp84] [~chenheng].

Thanks.

> Add first AsyncTable impl and create TableImpl based on it
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15921
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15921
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Jurriaan Mous
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-15921-v2.patch, HBASE-15921.demo.patch, 
> HBASE-15921.patch, HBASE-15921.v1.patch
>
>
> First we create an AsyncTable interface with implementation without the Scan 
> functionality. Those will land in a separate patch since they need a refactor 
> of existing scans.
> Also added is a new TableImpl to replace HTable. It uses the AsyncTableImpl 
> internally and should be a bit faster because it does jump through less hoops 
> to do ProtoBuf transportation. This way we can run all existing tests on the 
> AsyncTableImpl to guarantee its quality.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to