[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15556045#comment-15556045
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16788:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 17s 
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} test4tests {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s 
{color} | {color:red} The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please 
list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 3m 
28s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 45s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
51s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
15s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m 
10s {color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 34s 
{color} | {color:green} master passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m 
56s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m 46s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m 46s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m 
50s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 
16s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hadoopcheck {color} | {color:green} 
27m 55s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 
2.4.0 2.4.1 2.5.0 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.7.1. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} hbaseprotoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 
13s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m 
53s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s 
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 13m 58s {color} 
| {color:red} hbase-server in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 
9s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 56m 3s {color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestRSStatusServlet |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=1.11.2 Server=1.11.2 Image:yetus/hbase:7bda515 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12832162/HBASE-16788.001.patch 
|
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-16788 |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  javac  javadoc  unit  findbugs  hadoopcheck  
hbaseanti  checkstyle  compile  |
| uname | Linux f4b1bd4bbc55 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed 
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/component/dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
 |
| git revision | master / bc9a972 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_101 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| unit | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3877/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
 |
| unit test logs |  
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3877/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3877/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hbase-server U: hbase-server |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/3877/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.3.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Race in compacted file deletion between HStore close() and 
> closeAndArchiveCompactedFiles()
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16788
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16788
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Gary Helmling
>            Assignee: Gary Helmling
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: 16788-suggest.v2, HBASE-16788.001.patch, 
> HBASE-16788_1.patch
>
>
> HBASE-13082 changed the way that compacted files are archived from being done 
> inline on compaction completion to an async cleanup by the 
> CompactedHFilesDischarger chore.  It looks like the changes to HStore to 
> support this introduced a race condition in the compacted HFile archiving.
> In the following sequence, we can wind up with two separate threads trying to 
> archive the same HFiles, causing a regionserver abort:
> # compaction completes normally and the compacted files are added to 
> {{compactedfiles}} in HStore's DefaultStoreFileManager
> # *threadA*: CompactedHFilesDischargeHandler runs in a RS executor service, 
> calling closeAndArchiveCompactedFiles()
> ## obtains HStore readlock
> ## gets a copy of compactedfiles
> ## releases readlock
> # *threadB*: calls HStore.close() as part of region close
> ## obtains HStore writelock
> ## calls DefaultStoreFileManager.clearCompactedfiles(), getting a copy of 
> same compactedfiles
> # *threadA*: calls HStore.removeCompactedfiles(compactedfiles)
> ## archives files in {compactedfiles} in HRegionFileSystem.removeStoreFiles()
> ## call HStore.clearCompactedFiles()
> ## waits on write lock
> # *threadB*: continues with close()
> ## calls removeCompactedfiles(compactedfiles)
> ## calls HRegionFIleSystem.removeStoreFiles() -> 
> HFileArchiver.archiveStoreFiles()
> ## receives FileNotFoundException because the files have already been 
> archived by threadA
> ## throws IOException
> # RS aborts
> I think the combination of fetching the compactedfiles list and removing the 
> files needs to be covered by locking.  Options I see are:
> * Modify HStore.closeAndArchiveCompactedFiles(): use writelock instead of 
> readlock and move the call to removeCompactedfiles() inside the lock.  This 
> means the read operations will be blocked while the files are being archived, 
> which is bad.
> * Synchronize closeAndArchiveCompactedFiles() and modify close() to call it 
> instead of calling removeCompactedfiles() directly
> * Add a separate lock for compacted files removal and use in 
> closeAndArchiveCompactedFiles() and close()



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to