[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15567597#comment-15567597
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16799:
------------------------------------------------
Why to remove - whether we can add @PRivate tag to those APIs? If any
LimitedPrivate interfaces are exposed to CPs that can contain some @Private
methods in that? I think that is what we discussed too.
> CP exposed Store should not expose unwanted APIs
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16799
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16799
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Anoop Sam John
> Assignee: Anoop Sam John
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16799.patch, HBASE-16799.patch,
> HBASE-16799_V2.patch
>
>
> Store is exposed to CPs. The main use cases I can think of are getting store
> scanner and other getters which return different states like memstore size,
> max seqId etc. Those make sense.
> But we added many other APIs which changes the state of the memstore, bulk
> load files etc into this interface. Even an API which expose the memstore
> itself!. This allow adding mutations into memstore bypassing all steps in
> region. We track the memstore size per region level as well as globally.
> These only allow us to flush region at sizes and/or flush selected regions
> because of global heap pressure. Now if a CP get hold of store and/or
> memstore, it can add mutations with out knowledge of these size accounting
> and possibly OOME the RS. Similar way the bulk load related APIs. At HRegion
> level, there are steps done (WAL write etc) after the bulk load HFile on
> store. So bypassing these wont be correct.
> In this jira, plan is to remove all such leaked APIs from Store. They are
> called from HRegion and we can type cast to HStore to call them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
