[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15567842#comment-15567842
]
ChiaPing Tsai commented on HBASE-16731:
---------------------------------------
[~ram_krish]
Yes, the feature should be added to GET.
On our applications, we use a small flag to filter some large data stored on
different CFs. Without this feature, we need to implement the code like
SingleColumnValueFilter on client-side, and it needs double GETs to retrieves
the data. (one GET checks the flag and another GET retrieves the data)
> Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16731
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
> Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16731.v0.patch, HBASE-16731.v1.patch,
> HBASE-16731.v2.patch
>
>
> RSRpcServices#get() converts the Get to Scan without
> scan#setLoadColumnFamiliesOnDemand. It causes that the result retrieved from
> Get and Scan will be different if we use the empty filter. Scan doesn't
> return any data but Get does.
> see [HBASE-16729 |https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16729]
> Any comments? Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
