[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15567853#comment-15567853
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16731:
------------------------------------------------

bq.Yes, the feature should be added to GET.
I think with your usecase it makes sense to add to GET itself.
And for multi CF cases even for Gets it makes sense to add this.  +1.

> Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-16731
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-16731.v0.patch, HBASE-16731.v1.patch, 
> HBASE-16731.v2.patch
>
>
> RSRpcServices#get() converts the Get to Scan without 
> scan#setLoadColumnFamiliesOnDemand. It causes that the result retrieved from 
> Get and Scan will be different if we use the empty filter. Scan doesn't 
> return any data but Get does.
> see [HBASE-16729 |https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16729]
> Any comments? Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to