[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15567853#comment-15567853
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16731:
------------------------------------------------
bq.Yes, the feature should be added to GET.
I think with your usecase it makes sense to add to GET itself.
And for multi CF cases even for Gets it makes sense to add this. +1.
> Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16731
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: ChiaPing Tsai
> Assignee: ChiaPing Tsai
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16731.v0.patch, HBASE-16731.v1.patch,
> HBASE-16731.v2.patch
>
>
> RSRpcServices#get() converts the Get to Scan without
> scan#setLoadColumnFamiliesOnDemand. It causes that the result retrieved from
> Get and Scan will be different if we use the empty filter. Scan doesn't
> return any data but Get does.
> see [HBASE-16729 |https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16729]
> Any comments? Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
