[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15579532#comment-15579532
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-15789:
--------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #1795 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/1795/])
Revert "HBASE-15789 PB related changes to work with offheap" (stack: rev 
0f384158fc3aec9672f4aae4c18fa4d47965567e)
* (edit) hbase-protocol-shaded/pom.xml
* (edit) hbase-protocol-shaded/README.txt
* (edit) hbase-server/pom.xml
* (edit) hbase-assembly/pom.xml
* (delete) hbase-protocol-shaded/src/main/patches/HBASE-15789_V2.patch
* (delete) 
hbase-protocol-shaded/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/shaded/com/google/protobuf/ByteInput.java
* (delete) 
hbase-protocol-shaded/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/shaded/com/google/protobuf/ByteInputByteString.java


> PB related changes to work with offheap
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-15789
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15789
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: regionserver
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: Anoop Sam John
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-15789.master.001.patch, HBASE-15789.patch, 
> HBASE-15789_V2.patch
>
>
> This is an issue to brainstorm. Whether we go with pb 2.x or pb 3.0 and also 
> depends on the shading of protobuf classes. 
> We should also decide if we are going to fork the PB classes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to