[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15678381#comment-15678381
 ] 

Guanghao Zhang commented on HBASE-17088:
----------------------------------------

Thanks. Marked the old constructors as deprecated in patch for branch-1.

> Refactor RWQueueRpcExecutor/BalancedQueueRpcExecutor/RpcExecutor
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17088
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17088
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: rpc
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Guanghao Zhang
>            Assignee: Guanghao Zhang
>         Attachments: HBASE-17088-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17088-v1.patch, 
> HBASE-17088-v2.patch, HBASE-17088-v3.patch, HBASE-17088-v3.patch, 
> HBASE-17088-v4.patch, HBASE-17088-v4.patch
>
>
> 1. The RWQueueRpcExecutor has eight constructor method and the longest one 
> has ten parameters. But It is only used in SimpleRpcScheduler and easy to 
> confused when read the code.
> 2. There are duplicate method implement in RWQueueRpcExecutor and 
> BalancedQueueRpcExecutor. They can be implemented in their parent class 
> RpcExecutor.
> 3. SimpleRpcScheduler read many configs to new RpcExecutor. But the 
> CALL_QUEUE_SCAN_SHARE_CONF_KEY is only needed by RWQueueRpcExecutor. And 
> CALL_QUEUE_CODEL_TARGET_DELAY, CALL_QUEUE_CODEL_INTERVAL and 
> CALL_QUEUE_CODEL_LIFO_THRESHOLD are only needed by AdaptiveLifoCoDelCallQueue.
> So I thought we can refactor it. Suggestions are welcome.
> Review board: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53726/



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to