[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15696348#comment-15696348
]
Sudeep Sunthankar commented on HBASE-15902:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks [~enis]. Please find my responses below
{quote}
The patch file seems it is only for the second part of two commits
{quote}
I had created this patch on top of Configuration and created both the patches
together, which is why it shows part 2/2.
{quote}
I don't see changes to BUCK files, so maybe they are there?
{quote}
I was getting some errors in patching BUCK with the patch created in the manner
above, so I kept BUCK out of the patch and planned on creating a separate patch
to hook up the tests.
{quote}
In this patch, we are allocating TimeRange objects in heap via a pointer,
versus in the Get object, we are embedding those objects:
{quote}
The way it is done in Get creates temporary objects, which is not required. I
should have allocated TimeRange objects in Get on heap as well. I will upload a
patch for it as well.
Thanks.
> Scan Object
> -----------
>
> Key: HBASE-15902
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15902
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Sudeep Sunthankar
> Assignee: Sudeep Sunthankar
> Attachments: HBASE-15902.HBASE-14850.patch,
> HBASE-15902.HBASE-14850.v2.patch
>
>
> Patch for creating Scan objects. Scan objects thus created can be used by
> Table implementation to fetch results for a given row.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
