[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15711807#comment-15711807
 ] 

ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-17191:
------------------------------------------------

Now the next thing is that in order to check for ByteBufferCell or not we 
cannot add it in CellUtil because hbase-common does not know about 
hbase-shaded-protobuf.
Is it ok if we directly add in ProtobufUtil#toCell in hbase-shaded-protobuf 
package?

> Make use of UnsafeByteOperations#unsafeWrap(ByteBuffer buffer) in 
> PBUtil#toCell(Cell cell)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17191
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17191
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>
> Since we now have support for BBs in 
> UnsafeByteOperations#unsafeWrap(ByteBuffer) . So for the non - java clients 
> while creating the PB result we could avoid the copy to an temp array. 
> Since we have a support to write to BB in ByteOutput having a result backed 
> by Bytebuffer should be fine. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to