[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15836948#comment-15836948
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-17527:
--------------------------------
For a table with in memory compaction, you would see:
{code}
'TestTable', {NAME => 'info', METADATA => {'IN_MEMORY_COMPACTION' => 'BASIC'}}
{code}
I tried ITBLL today built from commit 616f4801b06a8427a03ceca9fb8345700ce1ad71.
This was what I got:
{code}
'IntegrationTestBigLinkedList', {NAME => 'OkQvw'}, {NAME => 'TqBUK'}, {NAME =>
'big', BLOOMFILTER => 'NONE', VERSIONS => '3', MIN_VERSIONS => '3', METADATA =>
{'COMPRESSION_COMPACT' => 'NONE'}}, {NAME => 'cumYq', METADATA =>
{'COMPRESSION_COMPACT' => 'NONE'}}, {NAME => 'meta', VERSIONS => '3',
MIN_VERSIONS => '3', METADATA => {'COMPRESSION_COMPACT' => 'NONE'}}, {NAME =>
'tiny', BLOOMFILTER => 'NONE', VERSIONS => '3', MIN_VERSIONS => '3', METADATA
=> {'COMPRESSION_COMPACT' => 'NONE'}}
{code}
> Allow IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table to be in memory compacted
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17527
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ted Yu
>
> Currently IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table doesn't support specification of
> in memory compaction scheme.
> This JIRA is to add support for specifying different in memory compaction
> policies.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
