[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15838091#comment-15838091
]
Josh Elser commented on HBASE-17527:
------------------------------------
bq. all table descriptors do not enable in memory compaction
bq. Then this is the problem, not ITBLL
I am also confused, [[email protected]]. I would have expected that, for the
new in-memory compaction feature, this would not be on by default .
Are new tables expected to use in-memory compactions by default?
If so, it seems like this fix should be addressed in HTD/HCD. Else, make
{{"inMemoryCompaction"}} a constant and I'm +1
> Allow IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table to be in memory compacted
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17527
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17527
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Attachments: 17527.v1.txt
>
>
> Currently IntegrationTestBigLinkedList table doesn't support specification of
> in memory compaction scheme.
> This JIRA is to add support for specifying different in memory compaction
> policies.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
