[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15893716#comment-15893716
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-17680:
--------------------------------

Ran valgrind again.
libjvm.so still showed up but there was no occurrence of MiniCluster.
This was from last run:
{code}
==21686==    by 0x426260: hbase::MiniCluster::CreateVM(JavaVM_**) 
(mini-cluster.cc:73)
==21686==    by 0x426B5A: hbase::MiniCluster::Setup() (mini-cluster.cc:115)
{code}

> Run mini cluster through JNI in tests
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-17680
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17680
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Assignee: Ted Yu
>         Attachments: 17680.v14.txt, 17680.v17.txt, 17680.v18.txt, 
> 17680.v1.txt, 17680.v20.txt, 17680.v22.txt, 17680.v23.txt, 17680.v26.txt, 
> 17680.v27.txt, 17680.v3.txt, 17680.v8.txt
>
>
> Currently tests start local hbase cluster through hbase shell.
> There is less control over the configuration of the local cluster this way.
> This issue would replace hbase shell with JNI interface to mini cluster.
> We would have full control over the cluster behavior.
> Thanks to [~devaraj] who started this initiative.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to