[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15900785#comment-15900785
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17712:
-----------------------------------
The failed UTs are unrelated and can pass locally.
Will commit shortly.
> Remove/Simplify the logic of RegionScannerImpl.handleFileNotFound
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17712
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17712
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17712-branch-1.patch, HBASE-17712.patch,
> HBASE-17712-ut.patch, HBASE-17712-v1.patch, HBASE-17712-v2.patch,
> HBASE-17712-v3.patch
>
>
> It is introduced in HBASE-13651 and the logic became much more complicated
> after HBASE-16304 due to a dead lock issue. It is really tough as sequence id
> is involved in and the method we called is used to serve secondary replica
> originally which does not handle write.
> In fact, in 1.x release, the problem described in HBASE-13651 is gone. Now we
> will write a compaction marker to WAL before deleting the compacted files. We
> can only consider a RS as dead after its WAL files are all closed so if the
> region has already been reassigned the compaction will fail as we can not
> write out the compaction marker.
> So theoretically, if we still hit FileNotFound exception, it should be a
> critical bug which means we may loss data. I do not think it is a good idea
> to just eat the exception and refresh store files. Or even if we want to do
> this, we can just refresh store files without dropping memstore contents.
> This will also simplify the logic a lot.
> Suggestions are welcomed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
