[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16226254#comment-16226254
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-19092:
------------------------------------------------
bq.At this stage I'd say just let them have ECB. Could even filter it via the
CP Env to remove the SequenceId method.... Or throw exception if they try to
mess w/ it.
Ok. So i wont add any new builder and will leave ECB as private for now. Which
means for CPs we don't give them a chance to build a tag. For now they can
read the tags? Is that fine?
I think making ECB LimitedPrivate is not right IMHO. What do you think?
> Make Tag IA.LimitedPrivate and expose for CPs
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-19092
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19092
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Coprocessors
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-19092-branch-2.patch,
> HBASE-19092_001-branch-2.patch
>
>
> We need to make tags as LimitedPrivate as some use cases are trying to use
> tags like timeline server. The same topic was discussed in dev@ and also in
> HBASE-18995.
> Shall we target this for beta1 - cc [[email protected]].
> So once we do this all related Util methods and APIs should also move to
> LimitedPrivate Util classes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
