[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16240502#comment-16240502
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-19177:
------------------------------------

bq.  If we can move to a newer/standard maven-fluido-skin probably the 
maven-site-plugin upgrade would be simpler.

Good to know. Thanks for sharing your findings, Peter! Will try to dig into 
this.

> Determine if custom maven-fluido-skin jar is still necessary
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19177
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19177
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: site
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-1
>
>
> To get a fancy, mobile-friendly website, HBASE-14785 introduced a patched 
> version of the maven-fluido-skin and committed the pre-built jar into our 
> release.
> A few folks have noticed this jar lurking around the 2.0.0 alpha releases. By 
> version number, it doesn't seem like we'd need to have this anymore (and can 
> use the newest version).
> Let's check it out.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to