[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16298506#comment-16298506
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19543:
-----------------------------------

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} docker {color} | {color:red}  0m  
2s{color} | {color:red} Docker failed to build yetus/hbase:tp-32202. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HBASE-19543 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12903050/HBASE-19543-HBASE-19397.patch
 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/10580/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.6.0   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> Abstract a replication storage interface to extract the zk specific code
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-19543
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19543
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: proc-v2, Replication
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>         Attachments: HBASE-19543-HBASE-19397.patch
>
>
> For now, we will do sanity checks at the same time when updating replication 
> peer. But this is not a safe way for procedure based replication peer 
> modification.
> For the old zk watcher way, the only thing is updating the data on zk, so if 
> the data is updated and then we crashes, there is no problem.
> For the new procedure way, we need to trigger refresh by ourselves after 
> updating zk. If we crashes after the updating and before we record the state 
> change of the procedure, we may fail with IllegalArgumentException when we 
> execute the procedure next time since the data on zk has already been updated.
> So the current way is to do sanity checks in PRE_PEER_MODIFICATION state, and 
> in UPDATE_STORAGE state we will not do sanity checks any more, just 
> update(overwrite) the peer storage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to