[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16377489#comment-16377489
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-20070:
-------------------------------------
{code}
#Remove previously-generated files
FILES_TO_REMOVE=("hbase-*"
"apidocs"
"devapidocs"
"testapidocs"
"testdevapidocs"
"xref"
"xref-test"
"*book*"
"*.html"
"*.pdf*"
"css"
"js"
"images")
for FILE in "${FILES_TO_REMOVE[@]}"; do
if [ -e "${FILE}" ]; then
echo "Removing ${WORKSPACE}/hbase-site/$FILE"
rm -Rf "${FILE}"
fi
done
{code}
Do you think this stanza is actually needed? Don't we delete the hbase-site
directory and do a fresh clone on each run?
> website generation is failing
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20070
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20070
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: website
> Reporter: Sean Busbey
> Assignee: Sean Busbey
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HBASE-20070-misty.patch, HBASE-20070-misty.patch.1,
> HBASE-20070.0.patch, HBASE-20070.1.patch,
> hbase-build-log-a29b3caf4dbc7b8833474ef5da5438f7f6907e00.txt
>
>
> website generation has been failing since Feb 20th
> {code}
> Checking out files: 100% (68971/68971), done.
> Usage: grep [OPTION]... PATTERN [FILE]...
> Try 'grep --help' for more information.
> PUSHED is 2
> is not yet mentioned in the hbase-site commit log. Assuming we don't have it
> yet. 2
> Building HBase
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=256m;
> support was removed in 8.0
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=256m;
> support was removed in 8.0
> Failure: mvn clean site
> Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure
> {code}
> The status email says
> {code}
> Build status: Still Failing
> The HBase website has not been updated to incorporate HBase commit
> ${CURRENT_HBASE_COMMIT}.
> {code}
> Looking at the code where that grep happens, it looks like the env variable
> CURRENT_HBASE_COMMIT isn't getting set. That comes from some git command. I'm
> guessing the version of git changed on the build hosts and upended our
> assumptions.
> we should fix this to 1) rely on git's porcelain interface, and 2) fail as
> soon as that git command fails
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)