[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16399735#comment-16399735
 ] 

Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-20105:
---------------------------------------------

[~anoop.hbase] storagePolicy contains the flush related policy. 
this.conf.get(ColumnFamilyDescriptorBuilder.STORAGE_POLICY); containts the CF 
related policy. They can be different. And the one after is indeed if there is 
nothing specific for this CF. So this sections does:
1) Use Flush policy
2) If none, use CF policy (HBASE-14061)
3) If none, use global config

Regarding HConstant, I have put it there becaure there is other flush related 
constants. Do you prefer that somewhere else? What do you suggest?

> Allow flushes to target SSD storage
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20105
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20105
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Performance, regionserver
>    Affects Versions: hbase-2.0.0-alpha-4
>            Reporter: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>            Assignee: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-20105-v0.patch, HBASE-20105-v1.patch, 
> HBASE-20105-v2.patch, HBASE-20105-v3.patch, HBASE-20105-v4.patch, 
> HBASE-20105-v5.patch, HBASE-20105-v6.patch
>
>
> On heavy writes usecases, flushes are compactes together pretty quickly. 
> Allowing flushes to go on SSD allows faster flush and faster first 
> compactions. Subsequent compactions going on regular storage.
>  
> I will be interesting to have an option to target SSD for flushes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to