[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16480833#comment-16480833
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on HBASE-20369:
------------------------------------

v7 seems a little messed up, so I built v8 based on v6

I fixed some bad formatting (where the method return type and method name had 
no space, e.g.voidpostSplit).

My only question is about how you generated this content, Triguna. I see 
{{hbase-server-1.0.0.jar}} in the output. The output looks like what JAPI 
compliance reports generate – how'd you pull this? The issue title made me 
think you were using hbase 1.1.2. Just want to make sure we're consistent in 
what we are calling things :)

> Document incompatibilities between HBase 1.1.2 and HBase 2.0
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20369
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20369
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Thiriguna Bharat Rao
>            Assignee: Thiriguna Bharat Rao
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: patch
>         Attachments: HBASE-20369.patch, HBASE-20369_v1.patch, 
> HBASE-20369_v2.patch, HBASE-20369_v3.patch, HBASE-20369_v4.patch, 
> HBASE-20369_v5.patch, HBASE-20369_v6.patch, HBASE-20369_v7.patch, 
> HBASE-20369_v8.patch, book.adoc
>
>
> Hi, 
> I compiled a  draft document for the HBase incompatibilities from the raw 
> source content that was available in HBase Beta 1 site. Can someone please 
> review and provide a feedback or share your comments on this document?
> Appreciate your support and time.
>  
> Best Regards, 
> Triguna



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to