[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13213328#comment-13213328
 ] 

jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HBASE-5166:
------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3995/#review5266
-----------------------------------------------------------



/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/MultithreadedTableMapper.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3995/#comment11506>

    "hbase.mapreduce." prefix should be kept.
    Would "hbase.mapreduce.multithreadedmapper.class" be a good name ?


- Ted


On 2012-02-22 03:22:25, Jai Singh wrote:
bq.  
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/3995/
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  
bq.  (Updated 2012-02-22 03:22:25)
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Review request for Michael Stack.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Summary
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  There is no MultiThreadedTableMapper in hbase currently just like we have 
a MultiThreadedMapper in Hadoop for IO Bound Jobs. 
bq.  UseCase, webcrawler: take input (urls) from a hbase table and put the 
content (urls, content) back into hbase. 
bq.  Running these kind of hbase mapreduce job with normal table mapper is 
quite slow as we are not utilizing CPU fully (N/W IO Bound).
bq.  
bq.  Moreover, I want to know whether It would be a good/bad idea to use HBase 
for these kind of usecases ?.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  This addresses bug HBASE-5166.
bq.      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5166
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Diffs
bq.  -----
bq.  
bq.    
/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/MultithreadedTableMapper.java 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/mapreduce/TestMulitthreadedTableMapper.java
 PRE-CREATION 
bq.  
bq.  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3995/diff
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Testing
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Thanks,
bq.  
bq.  Jai
bq.  
bq.


                
> MultiThreaded Table Mapper analogous to MultiThreaded Mapper in hadoop
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5166
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5166
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jai Kumar Singh
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: multithreaded, tablemapper
>         Attachments: 0001-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper-HBASE-5166.patch, 
> 0003-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper-HBASE-5166.patch, 
> 0005-HBASE-5166-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper.patch, 
> 0006-HBASE-5166-Added-MultithreadedTableMapper.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.5h
>
> There is no MultiThreadedTableMapper in hbase currently just like we have a 
> MultiThreadedMapper in Hadoop for IO Bound Jobs. 
> UseCase, webcrawler: take input (urls) from a hbase table and put the content 
> (urls, content) back into hbase. 
> Running these kind of hbase mapreduce job with normal table mapper is quite 
> slow as we are not utilizing CPU fully (N/W IO Bound).
> Moreover, I want to know whether It would be a good/bad idea to use HBase for 
> these kind of usecases ?. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to