[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16528533#comment-16528533
 ] 

Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-20812:
----------------------------------------

Should we add default implementation to the new method in the future? If so, 
should we document this rule? BTW, the #getName and #getTableDescriptor can 
have default implementation also (use #getDescriptor)

> Add defaults to Table Interface so implementors don't have to
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-20812
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20812
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 2.0.2
>
>         Attachments: 20812.txt, HBASE-20812.branch-2.0.001.patch, 
> HBASE-20812.branch-2.0.002.patch, HBASE-20812.branch-2.0.003.patch
>
>
> Lets add default implementaitons -- even if they are just throw 
> NotImplementedException -- to our Table Interface now we are up on jdk8. 
> Table implementations are how the likes of hbase-indexer modify hbase --via  
> a publically supported API -- and I notice that the kafka proxy now goes the 
> same route. Typically, these customizations are only interested in one or two 
> methods of Table adding in their own implementations but they have to supply 
> implementations for all Table methods in their override. Lets help them out 
> by adding defaults (I had a patch but lost it...). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to