[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13216019#comment-13216019
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
------------------------------
bq. I feel some of the recent proposals / requirements are far more complex
than the one
Yeah. It seemed basic back in December.
bq. There wasn't such requirement when Mubarak outlined his plan
Pardon me. I should have noticed the plan but did not. Other priorities. If
I'd seen the plan I'd have blanched I think.
bq. Of course, having generic framework for all the master-coordinated tasks
allows future additions to be concise.
Yep. We'd have tested, proven primitives to build stuff on rather than have to
do it per feature
bq. But I think that should have been outlined clearly in the early stage of
development of a feature.
See above. Pardon me for missing how involved this addition became.
I don't see how plan of ' 01/Feb/12 07:43' lays foundation for a generic
framework. Am I missing something? It seems like its code for this feature
only?
> Provide capability to delete named region
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4991
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: Mubarak Seyed
> Fix For: 0.94.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-4991.trunk.v1.patch, HBASE-4991.trunk.v2.patch
>
>
> See discussion titled 'Able to control routing to Solr shards or not' on
> lily-discuss
> User may want to quickly dispose of out of date records by deleting specific
> regions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
