[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16544223#comment-16544223
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-20884:
--------------------------------
Results for branch master
[build #396 on
builds.a.o|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/396/]: (x)
*{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/396//General_Nightly_Build_Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/396//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop2)/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/396//JDK8_Nightly_Build_Report_(Hadoop3)/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> Replace usage of our Base64 implementation with java.util.Base64
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-20884
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20884
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Mike Drob
> Assignee: Mike Drob
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 1.5.0, 1.2.7, 1.3.3, 1.4.6, 2.0.2, 2.1.1
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20884.branch-1.001.patch,
> HBASE-20884.branch-1.002.patch, HBASE-20884.master.001.patch
>
>
> We have a public domain implementation of Base64 that is copied into our code
> base and infrequently receives updates. We should replace usage of that with
> the new Java 8 java.util.Base64 where possible.
> For the migration, I propose a phased approach.
> * Deprecate on 1.x and 2.x to signal to users that this is going away.
> * Replace usages on branch-2 and master with j.u.Base64
> * Delete our implementation of Base64 on master.
> Does this seem in line with our API compatibility requirements?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
