[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13220165#comment-13220165
]
stack commented on HBASE-4991:
------------------------------
@Ted
bq. Do you think we should continue discussion on the new framework under
HBASE-5487 ?
It might be time to kill this issue and start up a new one. Not under 5487
though. What you think Mubarak? I'd think that if we started a new issue,
it'd be called online merge and would first work out the design.
@Mubarak
bq. 10 to 18 goes to RS side....We need ZK trackers in both sides, isn't?
I don't think so. Master is just asking the regionservers to close regions.
Master can create regions and do the moving of data from old regions into new.
Its just fs operations. No need of regionserver context, especially not live
regionserver context.
> Provide capability to delete named region
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4991
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4991
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: Mubarak Seyed
> Fix For: 0.94.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-4991.trunk.v1.patch, HBASE-4991.trunk.v2.patch
>
>
> See discussion titled 'Able to control routing to Solr shards or not' on
> lily-discuss
> User may want to quickly dispose of out of date records by deleting specific
> regions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
