[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13228108#comment-13228108
]
Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-4608:
------------------------------------
bq. First, compression ratio is not good - at least for the data written by PE.
I saw ~40% compression on a YCSB load. So some workloads may have good results
whereas others didn't. Did you also re-run the test after fixing the bug? Maybe
that skewed the results?
bq. Second, HLogKey persistence becomes dependent on the compression
implementation. This would make plugging other compression techniques hard.
I agree we should use a metadata field in the log to describe which compression
mechanism is being used.
> HLog Compression
> ----------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4608
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4608
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Li Pi
> Assignee: Li Pi
> Fix For: 0.94.0
>
> Attachments: 4608-v19.txt, 4608-v20.txt, 4608-v22.txt, 4608v1.txt,
> 4608v13.txt, 4608v13.txt, 4608v14.txt, 4608v15.txt, 4608v16.txt, 4608v17.txt,
> 4608v18.txt, 4608v5.txt, 4608v6.txt, 4608v7.txt, 4608v8fixed.txt
>
>
> The current bottleneck to HBase write speed is replicating the WAL appends
> across different datanodes. We can speed up this process by compressing the
> HLog. Current plan involves using a dictionary to compress table name, region
> id, cf name, and possibly other bits of repeated data. Also, HLog format may
> be changed in other ways to produce a smaller HLog.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
