[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16803137#comment-16803137
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-22087:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
bq. This is concerning, as relocating and including javax.activation is
probably not correct behavior.
This was explicitly included in Hadoop because of JDK9 support.
I excluded javax.activation from HBase. This should be consistent with the
handling of javax.annotation.
{quote}
I get that. I'm just saying that it's not clear to me that it should be done
this broadly. e.g. JVM for JDK8 already provides the {{javax.annotation}}
classes. Should these versions of Hadoop not be used with JDK8? JDK9 and JDK10
will provide the {{javax.annotation}} module so long as you start with
{{--add-modules javax.annotation}}. The only place you *need* to have it
brought with you is JDK11+.
> Update LICENSE/shading for the dependencies from the latest Hadoop trunk
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-22087
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22087
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
> Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HBASE-22087.master.001.patch, depcheck_hadoop33.log
>
>
> The following list of dependencies were added in Hadoop trunk (3.3.0) and
> HBase does not compile successfully:
> YARN-8778 added jline 3.9.0
> HADOOP-15775 added javax.activation
> HADOOP-15531 added org.apache.common.text (commons-text)
> HADOOP-15764 added dnsjava (org.xbill)
> Some of these are needed to support JDK9/10/11 in Hadoop.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
