[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16834240#comment-16834240
]
Biju Nair commented on HBASE-17028:
-----------------------------------
Thanks [~ben.manes] for sharing your thoughts :-). It is a good idea to move to
an org or have a community around the library.
As far as this issue is concerned assuming you are fine with the update to the
doc in the patch. That would help [~stack]/[~anoop.hbase] to merge it.
> New 2.0 blockcache (tinylfu) doesn't have inmemory partition, etc Update doc
> and codebase accordingly
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17028
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: BlockCache
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Biju Nair
> Priority: Major
> Labels: BlockCache, TinyLFU
> Attachments: HBASE-17028.patch
>
>
> Intent is to make the parent tinylfu blockcache default on in 2.0 replacing
> our old lru blockcache. This issue is about making it clear in doc and code
> how the new blockcache differs from the old (You can put back the old lru
> blockcache with config change).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
