[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16862795#comment-16862795
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-22564:
-----------------------------------
OK, tried multi put
{noformat}
./bin/hbase pe --nomapred --presplit=10 --autoFlush=true --multiPut=100
--rows=1000000 randomWrite 10 &>test_write.log < /dev/null &
{noformat}
master
{noformat}
2019-06-13 15:35:07,037 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest] Summary of timings (ms): [39576, 38874, 39181, 38928, 39234,
39165, 39423, 39356, 39240, 39249]
2019-06-13 15:35:07,047 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest duration ] Min: 38874ms Max: 39576ms Avg: 39222ms
2019-06-13 15:35:07,047 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg latency
(us)] 3472
2019-06-13 15:35:07,047 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg
TPS/QPS] 254962 row per second
{noformat}
HBASE-21512
{noformat}
2019-06-13 15:36:47,018 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest] Summary of timings (ms): [37016, 36973, 37040, 37176, 37189,
36650, 36994, 37319, 37240, 36923]
2019-06-13 15:36:47,028 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation:
[RandomWriteTest duration ] Min: 36650ms Max: 37319ms Avg: 37052ms
2019-06-13 15:36:47,028 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg latency
(us)] 3320
2019-06-13 15:36:47,028 INFO [main] hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: [ Avg
TPS/QPS] 269897 row per second
{noformat}
The new implementation is a bit better, which means the new implementation for
batch call is not worse than the old AsyncProcess. So I think the problem here
is only in the new BufferedMutator or the AsyncBufferedMutator implementation.
Let me dig...
> Compare performance number with old sync client implementation
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-22564
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22564
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
